-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Update variables.tf #1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughRemoved two public Terraform variables and renamed one in Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Comment |
Note Unit test generation is an Early Access feature. Expect some limitations and changes as we gather feedback and continue to improve it. Generating unit tests... This may take up to 20 minutes. |
2 similar comments
Note Unit test generation is an Early Access feature. Expect some limitations and changes as we gather feedback and continue to improve it. Generating unit tests... This may take up to 20 minutes. |
Note Unit test generation is an Early Access feature. Expect some limitations and changes as we gather feedback and continue to improve it. Generating unit tests... This may take up to 20 minutes. |
✅ UTG Post-Process Complete No new issues were detected in the generated code and all check runs have completed. The unit test generation process has completed successfully. |
Creating a PR to put the unit tests in... The changes have been created in this pull request: View PR |
Here are the copyable unit test edits: Copyable Editstests/test_variables_tf.pyThis is a new file.
|
…tic channel upgrade
Creating a local commit for the generated unit tests... The unit tests have been committed to the current branch. Commit ID: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
test/unit/unit_test.go (4)
312-330
: Consider improving the test name for clarity.The test name
TestScaleDownDelayAfterDeleteNotSetShouldUseCustomScanInterval
could be more concise while maintaining clarity. Consider renaming toTestScaleDownDelayAfterDeleteFallbackToCustomScanInterval
.
327-328
: Redundant assertion can be simplified.The test already sets
auto_scaler_profile_scan_interval
to "30s" on line 316, so asserting its value on lines 327-328 is redundant. The only meaningful assertion here is thatscaleDownDelayAfterDelete
equalsscanInterval
.- assert.Equal(t, "30s", scanInterval) assert.Equal(t, scanInterval, scaleDownDelayAfterDelete)
379-401
: Consider adding a test helper comment about the distinction.While the test correctly validates that an empty location string triggers data source querying, it would be helpful to document why this differs from the test on line 281 where location is omitted entirely.
Add a comment before line 380:
// Test_LogAnalyticsWorkspaceWithEmptyLocation_ShouldQueryDS ensures that an explicitly empty location // triggers the same behavior as not specifying a location at all. +// This differs from Test_LogAnalyticsWorkspaceWithoutLocationShouldQueryDSForWorkspaceLocation where +// the location field is omitted from the map entirely, testing both edge cases for proper handling. func Test_LogAnalyticsWorkspaceWithEmptyLocation_ShouldQueryDS(t *testing.T) {
391-391
: Redundant test helper declaration.The
t.Helper()
call on line 397 already exists, making line 391's deferred function unnecessary verbose.varFile := test_helper.VarsToFile(t, vars) - defer func() { _ = os.Remove(varFile) }() + defer os.Remove(varFile)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/unit/unit_test.go
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
test/unit/unit_test.go (2)
334-353
: LGTM! Well-structured test for override behavior.The test clearly validates that an explicit
auto_scaler_profile_scale_down_delay_after_delete
value takes precedence overauto_scaler_profile_scan_interval
, and includes appropriate assertions for both values.
355-377
: LGTM! Good edge case coverage.This test properly validates that the workspace being disabled takes precedence over any provided solution configuration, which is important defensive behavior.
// TestInvalidAutomaticChannelUpgradeValue guards against unexpected inputs by ensuring | ||
// the check is not considered passing for unknown channels. | ||
func TestInvalidAutomaticChannelUpgradeValue(t *testing.T) { | ||
t.Parallel() | ||
vars := map[string]interface{}{ | ||
"prefix": "foo", | ||
"resource_group_name": "bar", | ||
"location": "eastus", | ||
"automatic_channel_upgrade": "unknown", // defensive test for invalid input | ||
} | ||
|
||
test_helper.RunUnitTest(t, "../../", "unit-test-fixture", terraform.Options{ | ||
Upgrade: false, | ||
Vars: vars, | ||
}, func(t *testing.T, output test_helper.TerraformOutput) { | ||
t.Helper() | ||
upgrades, ok := output["automatic_channel_upgrade_check"].(bool) | ||
assert.True(t, ok) | ||
assert.False(t, upgrades, "unknown automatic_channel_upgrade should not pass the check") | ||
}) | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
Consider verifying the fixture handles invalid values gracefully.
The test assumes that the fixture properly handles the "unknown" value for automatic_channel_upgrade
. If the fixture doesn't validate this input, the test might pass for the wrong reasons (e.g., due to a panic or error rather than deliberate validation).
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the fixture validates automatic_channel_upgrade values
fd -e tf -e hcl . --exec grep -l "automatic_channel_upgrade" | head -5 | xargs grep -A5 -B5 "automatic_channel_upgrade"
Length of output: 6973
Fix test: fixture rejects unknown automatic_channel_upgrade
— update test or input
unit-test-fixture/variables.tf contains a validation that only allows "patch", "stable", "rapid", "node-image", so passing "unknown" will trigger Terraform variable validation. Update TestInvalidAutomaticChannelUpgradeValue (test/unit/unit_test.go lines 403–423) to either expect a validation error or use an allowed value.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
test/unit/unit_test.go lines 403-423: the test currently sets
automatic_channel_upgrade to "unknown" which the fixture's variables.tf
validation rejects; either change the input to one of the allowed values
("patch", "stable", "rapid", "node-image") and update the assertions to match
the expected output for that allowed value, or modify the test to assert that
Terraform variable validation fails (i.e., expect and assert a validation error
from the test helper instead of treating the run as successful).
Describe your changes
Issue number
#000
Checklist before requesting a review
CHANGELOG.md
fileThanks for your cooperation!
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
Tests